Administrative and Public Law

"This niche Birmingham firm is well regarded for its work representing individuals in human rights claims. It enjoys a strong reputation for its representation of claimants affected by the \war on terror, having acted for Iraqi civilians and the families of British soldiers killed in Iraq. The firm has expertise in international human rights law and acts for Daoud Mousa and nine others in the Baha Mousa public inquiry."

KEY INDIVIDUALS Philip Shiner leads the team and is considered to be "committed, driven, determined and admirable."

Band 1 (Philip Shiner)

Band 2 (Firm)


Civil Liberties

"This public law firm is renowned for its cutting-edge work defending the human rights of individuals connected to the Iraq war. It recently won success in the landmark ECHR case which condemned the UK government for breaching international human rights law for subjecting two Iraqis to the fear of execution in Iraq."

"KEY INDIVIDUALS Philip Shiner is an outstanding civil liberties solicitor who handles "terrific, ground-breaking cases" and "never gives up fighting for his clients." Dan Carey has emerged as a force in his own right. He is praised for his involvement in significant human rights cases including Al-Sweady, Evans, Al-Haq and the Baha Mousa Inquiry."

Star Rating (Philip Shiner)

Associate to Watch (Dan Carey)

Band 2 (Firm)

Chambers and Partners
 
 

PIL: Legal Challenge to "Back to work schemes"

Today we are asking the High Court to quash the regulations[1] under which the Government has made many of its “back to work” schemes. We represent two clients who have been subject to very different schemes. Cait Reilly, will speak about her experiences shortly.

Our other client, a qualified mechanic, under a scheme known as the Community Action Programme was required to work unpaid, cleaning furniture, for 30 hours per week for six months. The scheme was not once properly explained to him. Whilst he desperately wants to find a job he objects to doing unpaid work that is unrelated to his qualifications and will not help him re-enter the job market. He refused to participate and as a result has been stripped of his Jobseekers Allowance for six months.  

Our clients argue that what the Government is doing is unlawful because:

  • The Regulations fail to provide any description of the schemes to which people like our client can be subjected. This is contrary to statute;
  • The Government has failed to publish any policies setting out the limits of the schemes; and  
  • The schemes are contrary to the prohibition on forced labour under Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Government’s mismanagement of these flagship reforms has resulted in a complete shambles where nobody understands the plethora of schemes that have been created and where the only ones benefiting are the companies getting free labour. Nothing has been done to improve the employment prospects of those like my clients.

Last year in November I was forced to leave my voluntary work at a local museum and work unpaid at a branch of Poundland. I was told that if I did not carry out the work placement I would lose my Job Seekers Allowance.  For two weeks I was made to stack shelves and clean floors. Poundland got free labour. I gained nothing. I received no training, I was not given a job interview at the end of the two weeks and the museum where I volunteer was left short staffed.

My experience only lasted two weeks, but under these regulations, some people will have to do unpaid work for up to six months.  Forcing people to work for free does nothing to tackle the causes of long term unemployment.

I am bringing this claim because I think the regulations under which thousands of jobseekers like me can be forced to work for free are unlawful and should be quashed. It is time to support people looking for work, not punish them.

Caitlin Reilly
 
See also:
Daily Mail
Google
Huffington Post
ITV News
The Telegraph
The Independent
The Birmingham Post
 
 


[1] Jobseeker’s Allowance (Employment, Skills and Enterprise) Regulations 2011


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...
  BBC: New Iraq abuse cases by British forces go to High Court...
  Public Interest Lawyers respond to false reports in the Sun Newspaper regarding cases relating to Af...
  Legal Challenge to Doncaster Mayor's Decision to Reduce Library Funding wins Permission to Appeal...
  Observer: Is Britain guilty of systemic torture in Iraq?...
  Ali Zaki Mousa (no.2) and Others v Secretary of State for Defence...
  Legal Challenge to Cuts to North Somerset Youth Services Wins Permission to Appeal...
  New Statesman: The trials of Roseline Akhalu...
  Maya Evans case: secret courts, torture and avoiding embarrassment...