Administrative and Public Law

"This niche Birmingham firm is well regarded for its work representing individuals in human rights claims. It enjoys a strong reputation for its representation of claimants affected by the \war on terror, having acted for Iraqi civilians and the families of British soldiers killed in Iraq. The firm has expertise in international human rights law and acts for Daoud Mousa and nine others in the Baha Mousa public inquiry."

KEY INDIVIDUALS Philip Shiner leads the team and is considered to be "committed, driven, determined and admirable."

Band 1 (Philip Shiner)

Band 2 (Firm)


Civil Liberties

"This public law firm is renowned for its cutting-edge work defending the human rights of individuals connected to the Iraq war. It recently won success in the landmark ECHR case which condemned the UK government for breaching international human rights law for subjecting two Iraqis to the fear of execution in Iraq."

"KEY INDIVIDUALS Philip Shiner is an outstanding civil liberties solicitor who handles "terrific, ground-breaking cases" and "never gives up fighting for his clients." Dan Carey has emerged as a force in his own right. He is praised for his involvement in significant human rights cases including Al-Sweady, Evans, Al-Haq and the Baha Mousa Inquiry."

Star Rating (Philip Shiner)

Associate to Watch (Dan Carey)

Band 2 (Firm)

Chambers and Partners
 
 

'Occupy Nottingham' Movement permitted to remain in centre of Nottingham pending full hearing

In a hearing at Nottingham County Court, the protesters of the ‘Occupy Nottingham’ movement were today informed that they would have a full trial to determine whether their camp should be allowed to remain in its current position in the centre of Nottingham. The Court confirmed that the three day trial will take place from 30th April 2012 to determine their continued right to protest.

The protesters took up occupation of a small section of Market Square, in the city centre of Nottingham, in October 2011. They have remained there undertaking a peaceful protest as part of the global ‘Occupy’ movement since that date.

The protestors instructed Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) when the local Council applied to Nottingham County Court to regain possession of the part of Square on which the Occupy camp is located. An initial hearing on 13th March 2012 was adjourned until today to give the protesters an opportunity to collect evidence to show the Court that they had a substantial defence to the Council’s claims over the land. Carl Freeman, one of the principal members of the camp, was nominated to be a representative for the movement during the ongoing proceedings.

At today’s hearing, the Council invited the Court to decide the case in their favour, suggesting that no further hearing was necessary and that the protesters’ defence need not be considered in full. PIL and Christopher Brown, a barrister at Matrix Chambers, argued that the protesters’ defence required careful and anxious consideration by the Court. It was suggested that the protesters’ rights of freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, enshrined by Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights, were considerable barriers to a summary disposal of the case.

The Court agreed that a full hearing was necessary and ordered that a trial should take place starting on 30th April 2012 to determine the protesters’ right to continue to occupy Market Square. Until that date, the camp will be entitled to remain in its current position and the Occupy Nottingham protest will continue.

A representative of Public Interest Lawyers stated:

"We welcome Nottingham County Court’s ruling today which allows the Occupy Nottingham protesters a full and substantial hearing of their case. To not give full consideration to how the protesters’ human rights of freedom of expression and freedom of assembly would be affected by their removal from the centre of Nottingham would have been an affront to justice. The camp now have an opportunity to persuade the Court that they should be allowed to continue to pursue the goals of the Occupy movement in the centre of Nottingham in a location that is both culturally and historically significant and that is integral to the protesters’ attempts to remain constantly engaged with the people of the city. Public Interest Lawyers will continue to assert the significance of the protesters’ rights to assemble in Market Square and the importance in public authorities, such as Nottingham County Council, recognising these rights in their interaction with this, and any other, protest group."


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  HIGH COURT RULES IN HUNDREDS OF IRAQI UNLAWFUL KILLINGS AND TORTURE CASES...
  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...
  BBC: New Iraq abuse cases by British forces go to High Court...
  Public Interest Lawyers respond to false reports in the Sun Newspaper regarding cases relating to Af...
  Legal Challenge to Doncaster Mayor's Decision to Reduce Library Funding wins Permission to Appeal...
  Observer: Is Britain guilty of systemic torture in Iraq?...
  Ali Zaki Mousa (no.2) and Others v Secretary of State for Defence...
  Legal Challenge to Cuts to North Somerset Youth Services Wins Permission to Appeal...
  New Statesman: The trials of Roseline Akhalu...