Public Interest Lawyers is an extraordinary firm of solicitors, who must be – certainly should be – the pride of the legal profession. Through their tenacity, quality and sheer hard work – often from unpromising beginnings and in dark times for public funding – they have single-handedly been responsible for shining the torchlight of legal accountability in a range of new areas. The work continues unabated. No barrister or judge, here or in Strasbourg, could have come to deal with the sorts of human rights issues which PIL continues to raise, but for their principled and brave pursuit of justice.

 

PIL demonstrates three further important things. First, how positive and constructive can be the use of public funding in public law cases, in the public interest. It has been hard. But PIL and the LSC have forged a partnership which is second to none, as to the importance of the cases that are brought, their success and their wider impact. Secondly, PIL demonstrates that London does not always lead, and a London-centric focus is neither helpful nor fair. This firm, from what are still sometimes thought of as “the provinces”, is the nation’s leader for human rights application in challenging cases. That PIL is looking, as a Birmingham-based firm. How refreshing for it to be that way.Thirdly, let it not be forgotten that PIL was set up as a new firm of solicitors. This is not the further and continued work of an established firm, set up long ago when times were different. This was an innovation; a leap of faith in the rule of law. It was a boat launched in a sea of uncertainty, which has turned out to be the flagship for public law accountability under the rule of law.

 

Michael Fordham QC
Michael Fordham QC
 
 

PIL: IN A UNANIMOUS VERDICT THE COURT OF APPEAL HOLD THE HOME SECRETARY ACTED UNLAWFULLY IN STRIPPING MR AL JEDDA OF HIS BRITISH CITIZENSHIP

Public Interest Lawyers today celebrate with their client – Hilal Al-Jedda – a decisive legal victory in the Court of Appeal, which today ruled unanimously that the UK Government’s decision to strip our client of his British citizenship was unlawful. 

 

Mr Al Jedda was born in Iraq in 1957. He came to the United Kingdom in 1992 and claimed asylum. In June 2000 he was granted British citizenship and due to a prohibition on dual nationality in Iraqi law he automatically lost his Iraqi citizenship.

 

In September 2004 he travelled to Iraq with his family. On 10 October 2004 he was arrested at his sister’s house and taken to a British detention facility in Basra. During his arrest and subsequent detention he alleges that he was seriously tortured and abused by British forces.

 

The British authorities maintain that his detention was necessary for imperative reasons of security and allege that he was involved in terrorism. Mr Al Jedda vehemently denies those allegations and no criminal charges have ever been brought against him. However, he remained in British custody in Iraq for over three years without charge.

 

On 14 December 2007, the Home Secretary signed an order depriving Mr Al Jedda of his British citizenship and on 30 December 2007 Mr Al Jedda was released from custody. On his release Mr Al Jedda travelled to Turkey where he remains today.

 

In January 2008, PIL on behalf of Mr Al Jedda, initiated a legal challenge to the deprivation of his citizenship. We have argued throughout that the deprivation order was unlawful because it rendered Mr Al Jedda stateless which is unlawful under the British Nationality Act. After over four years of litigation the Court of Appeal have today unanimously held in Mr Al Jedda’s favour and declared that the Home Secretary’s decision to strip Mr Al Jedda of his citizenship in December 2007 should be quashed.

 

See:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/terror-suspect-hilal-aljedda-in-nationality-win-7600084.html

 

Speaking today, Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers said:

 

“Hilal Al Jedda and his family were thrown into a legal limbo by the British Government when it annulled his British Citizenship without a second thought.  It has taken him many years of legal struggle for the Court of Appeal to finally deem that act to be unlawful.  He is now one step closer to returning to the home that he loves.”

 

Tessa Gregory of Public Interest Lawyers added:

 

“Today’s judgment underlines the need for the Government to exercise more care when taking the draconian step of depriving a British national of their citizenship. It is only fair and right that the Court of Appeal have today ordered the quashing of the Home Secretary’s decision in which, in clear violation of UK law, deprived our client of his British citizenship in circumstances where he was rendered stateless.”

  

See judgment at http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/judgments/2012/al-jeeda-judgment-29032012


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  HIGH COURT RULES IN HUNDREDS OF IRAQI UNLAWFUL KILLINGS AND TORTURE CASES...
  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...
  BBC: New Iraq abuse cases by British forces go to High Court...
  Public Interest Lawyers respond to false reports in the Sun Newspaper regarding cases relating to Af...
  Legal Challenge to Doncaster Mayor's Decision to Reduce Library Funding wins Permission to Appeal...
  Observer: Is Britain guilty of systemic torture in Iraq?...
  Ali Zaki Mousa (no.2) and Others v Secretary of State for Defence...
  Legal Challenge to Cuts to North Somerset Youth Services Wins Permission to Appeal...
  New Statesman: The trials of Roseline Akhalu...