Administrative and Public Law

"This niche Birmingham firm is well regarded for its work representing individuals in human rights claims. It enjoys a strong reputation for its representation of claimants affected by the war on terror, having acted for Iraqi civilians and the families of British soldiers killed in Iraq. The firm has expertise in international human rights law and acts for Daoud Mousa and nine others in the Baha Mousa public inquiry."

KEY INDIVIDUALS Philip Shiner leads the team and is considered to be "committed, driven, determined and admirable."

Band 1 (Philip Shiner)

Band 2 (Firm)


Civil Liberties

"This public law firm is renowned for its cutting-edge work defending the human rights of individuals connected to the Iraq war. It recently won success in the landmark ECHR case which condemned the UK government for breaching international human rights law for subjecting two Iraqis to the fear of execution in Iraq."

"KEY INDIVIDUALS Philip Shiner is an outstanding civil liberties solicitor who handles "terrific, ground-breaking cases" and "never gives up fighting for his clients."

Star Rating (Philip Shiner)

Band 2 (Firm)

Chambers and Partners
 
 

Legal Challenge To The Rise In Tuition Fees To Be Heard 1 And 2 November 2011 At The Royal Courts Of Justice

A claim brought by two sixth form students, Callum Hurley (age 17) and Katy Moore (age 17), challenging the lawfulness of the Coalition Government’s policy of increasing the maximum amount of tuition fees in England to £9,000 per annum is to be heard by two judges in the High Court on 1 and 2 November 2011.[1]  The hearing will commence at 10:30am on 1 November.  If it succeeds, Vince Cable MP, Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, will be forced back to the drawing board.

 

The Claimants, who are represented by Public Interest Lawyers, lodged their claim on 18 March 2011.  They argue that the regulations raising the maximum fee to £9,000 breaches the right to education protected by the Human Rights Act 1999.  The European Court of Human Rights has previously indicated that where a state sets up higher education institutions, the right of access must be “effective,” and not theoretical or illusory.  The Claimants argue that the fear of debt in excess of £50,000 will render the right of access illusory, particularly amongst students from poorer backgrounds who are known to be more averse to debt.  Moreover, the right to education must be read in light of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which the UK is a signatory, which requires states to work progressively towards free higher education.  The Claimants also argue that, in the rush of the Secretary of State to pass the regulations, he did not discharge his duty to give due regard to issues of equality.

 

On 23 June 2011, Mr Justice Collins granted permission for the Claimants’ claim to proceed to a full hearing.  Mr Justice Collins said it was “arguable” that “there has been insufficient regard paid to the question of participation and to the likelihood (a possibility recognised by the Defendant [the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills]) that fewer low income potential students will want to take the financial risk.”  He said: “The equality duty depends on an [Equality Impact Assessment] said to be ‘interim’ – that does not inculcate confidence in its reliability.” 

 

The claim seeks the repeal of the Higher Education (Higher Amount) Regulations 2010 and an assurance that a proper equality impact assessment is made before any replacement policy is formulated.

 

Callum Hurley and Katy Moore will be making a statement outside the Royal Courts of Justice at 9:45 am on 1 November 2011.



[1] Reflecting the seriousness of the issues, the case will be heard by a Court of Appeal Judge sitting with a High Court Judge.


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  UK links to torture go beyond complicity to active involvement...
  Newsweek: “British Soldiers Accused of Torture and Abuse During Iraq Occupation” ...
  Press Release: Public Interest Lawyers' Response to the Al-Sweady Inquiry Report...
  Public Interest Lawyers reconstitutes as a Non-Governmental Organisation...
  Inquest Reports on Suicide in Serco-run Prison...
  Independent on Sunday: New torture claims go to court...
  Media Comment: Bad Month for MoJ...
  'No justice in sight for Iraqi victims of alleged murder, rape, and torture'...
  At least 30 other 'Baha Mousa' style killings ...
  Press Release : Coalition Minister is ‘Minded to’ Duck Out of Library Inquiry....
  PIL Maintains Top Rankings in Chambers UK Guide 2015. ...
  PIL Concerned by Investigation Into Grieving Daughter...
  Grayling to Auction Off Probation Service...
  The Times reports on the LAA investigation into PIL ...
  Yet more unchecked mass surveillance operations come to light...
  PIL welcomes House of Lords amendments to the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill...
  PIL disappointed with UK’s regression in gender equality...
  Homosexual Asylum Seekers Face Intrusive and Inappropriate Questioning...
  Blackwater Security Guards found guilty of murder of Iraqi civilians in 2007...
  Coalition of charities highlights outrageous government policy...
  Daily Star: Sick ex-soldier demands vital documents from MoD over Gulf War Syndrome...
  Big Issue: Superman isn’t here to protect us but the Human Rights Act is ...