Public Interest Lawyers is an extraordinary firm of solicitors, who must be – certainly should be – the pride of the legal profession. Through their tenacity, quality and sheer hard work – often from unpromising beginnings and in dark times for public funding – they have single-handedly been responsible for shining the torchlight of legal accountability in a range of new areas. The work continues unabated. No barrister or judge, here or in Strasbourg, could have come to deal with the sorts of human rights issues which PIL continues to raise, but for their principled and brave pursuit of justice.

 

PIL demonstrates three further important things. First, how positive and constructive can be the use of public funding in public law cases, in the public interest. It has been hard. But PIL and the LSC have forged a partnership which is second to none, as to the importance of the cases that are brought, their success and their wider impact. Secondly, PIL demonstrates that London does not always lead, and a London-centric focus is neither helpful nor fair. This firm, from what are still sometimes thought of as “the provinces”, is the nation’s leader for human rights application in challenging cases. That PIL is looking, as a Birmingham-based firm. How refreshing for it to be that way.Thirdly, let it not be forgotten that PIL was set up as a new firm of solicitors. This is not the further and continued work of an established firm, set up long ago when times were different. This was an innovation; a leap of faith in the rule of law. It was a boat launched in a sea of uncertainty, which has turned out to be the flagship for public law accountability under the rule of law.

 

Michael Fordham QC
Michael Fordham QC
 
 

The Muslim News: Hooding Prisoners ‘Unlawful,’ Court Rules

Hamed Chapman
 
The Government has been found guilty of unlawfully condoning the hooding of prisoners in its guidance to intelligence officers and service personnel.

The ruling at London’s High Court means that the Government will now have to again revise the Consolidated Guidance to Intelligence Officers and Service Personnel, which was only issued by Prime Minister David Cameron in July last year.

The latest case was brought by Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) on behalf of Iraqi prisoner, Alaa’ Nassif Jassim Al-Bazzouni, who was subjected to hooding by British forces in 2006.

Phil Shiner of PIL said judgement represents the final nail in the coffin of the Ministry of Defence’s “desperate and morally corrupt efforts to keep hooding alive as a permissible interrogation technique.”

“The MoD’s position has been that it is still legally permissible for security reasons. This judgment slams the door shut forever on hooding involving UK personnel anywhere in the world,” Shiner said in a statement.

The UK’s guidance is that that sight deprivation and hooding of prisoners was inhumane and unlawful “except where these do not pose a risk to the detainee’s physical or mental health and is necessary for security reasons during arrest or transit.”

But the court found that Al-Bazzouni had “convincing uncontradicted evidence” that hooding “will always by its nature pose a risk to the detainee’s physical and mental health.”

The ruling was brought alongside a judgement on a separate challenge to the same guidance by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

The ruling was delayed until after last month’s publication of the official inquiry into the death of Basra hotel worker Baha Mousa, which concluded that British soldiers inflicted an “appalling episode of serious, gratuitous violence” on a number of Iraqi civilian detainees leading to the death. It also recommended an absolute prohibition on hooding.

Another judicial review yet to be heard is being brought on controversial interrogation tactic currently permitted in the practice of ‘harshing’, where soldiers scream and shout close up to a detainees’ face in order to intimidate the suspect and break down his or her psychological resistance.
 


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  Appeal in legal challenge to cuts to North Somerset youth services will be heard on 13 June 2013...
  Claimants launch legal challenge to DWP’s emergency retrospective legislation ...
  PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS: UK’S USE OF DRONES IN AFGHANISTAN “HIGHLY LIKELY” TO BREACH INTERNATIONAL ...
  PIL: Afghans 'unlawfully held' by UK forces at Camp Bastion to be transferred to Afghan authorities...
  Public Interest Lawyers' Response to Ministry of Justice Consultation on proposed reforms to legal a...
  Guardian: Camp Bastion detainees challenge the notion of British justice in Afghanistan...
  AFGHANS 'UNLAWFULLY HELD' BY UK FORCES AT CAMP BASTION...
  HIGH COURT RULES IN HUNDREDS OF IRAQI UNLAWFUL KILLINGS AND TORTURE CASES...
  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...