Public Interest Lawyers is an extraordinary firm of solicitors, who must be – certainly should be – the pride of the legal profession. Through their tenacity, quality and sheer hard work – often from unpromising beginnings and in dark times for public funding – they have single-handedly been responsible for shining the torchlight of legal accountability in a range of new areas. The work continues unabated. No barrister or judge, here or in Strasbourg, could have come to deal with the sorts of human rights issues which PIL continues to raise, but for their principled and brave pursuit of justice.

 

PIL demonstrates three further important things. First, how positive and constructive can be the use of public funding in public law cases, in the public interest. It has been hard. But PIL and the LSC have forged a partnership which is second to none, as to the importance of the cases that are brought, their success and their wider impact. Secondly, PIL demonstrates that London does not always lead, and a London-centric focus is neither helpful nor fair. This firm, from what are still sometimes thought of as “the provinces”, is the nation’s leader for human rights application in challenging cases. That PIL is looking, as a Birmingham-based firm. How refreshing for it to be that way.Thirdly, let it not be forgotten that PIL was set up as a new firm of solicitors. This is not the further and continued work of an established firm, set up long ago when times were different. This was an innovation; a leap of faith in the rule of law. It was a boat launched in a sea of uncertainty, which has turned out to be the flagship for public law accountability under the rule of law.

 

Michael Fordham QC
Michael Fordham QC
 
 

Phil Shiner Shortlisted for Legal Personality of the Year Award

Phil Shiner, the lead solicitor at Public Interest Lawyers (PIL), has been shortlisted for one of the prestigious Law Society Excellence Awards.  Phil, who founded PIL in 1999, is one of six lawyers vying for the Gazette’s “Legal Personality of the Year Award”. 
 
In the last year, Phil has led the PIL team to successes in a number of high-profile cases both in the UK and in Europe, including:

-          Suppiah and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, in which two single mothers and their young families successfully argued that their detention at Yarl’s Wood Immigration Removal Centre had violated their rights to liberty and security of the person, establishing that child detention in this country could only be lawful if carried out on an ‘exceptional basis’;

-          Al-Skeini and Others v the United Kingdom, where Iraqi nationals established before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights that the Secretary of State for Defence must investigate the deaths of their families members because, contrary to what the House of Lords had held, they did fall within the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the European Convention on Human Rights when they were killed;

-          Al-Jedda and Others v the United Kingdom, in which the Grand Chamber held that if the UN Security Council is to displace human rights laws, in this case in Iraq, then it must do so expressly.  For that reason, the applicant had been detained unlawfully;

-          Al-Bazzouni v Secretary of State for Defence, the challenge to the Government’s “hooding” guidance in which PIL established that hooding is always unlawful and can never be repeated by UK state agents;

-          The Baha Mousa Inquiry Report, in which Sir William Gage documented the many MoD corporate failures and individual abuses that lead to the brutal death of tortured Iraqi hotel receptionist, Baha Mousa, whilst in the custody of 1 Queen’s Lancashire Regiment in Basra;

-          Hurley and Moore v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, a case in which PIL has successfully obtained permission from the High Court to challenge the decision to allow universities in England and Wales to charge incoming students up to £9,000 per year in tuition fees.  The full hearing in the case will take place on 1 and 2 November;

-          Evans v Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, where Maya Evans successfully challenged the Ministry of Justice’s decision to deny legal aid to litigants who did not stand to gain a personal or family benefit from a judicial review action.  PIL exposed the role played behind the scenes –and not disclosed to consultees – by the Ministry of Defence, which, it transpired, had warned an MoJ Minister of the “threat to national security” posed by PIL’s public interest cases;

-          Um Haider v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs, where an Iraqi woman successfully settled her case alleging abuse by contractors working at the British Embassy in Baghdad;

-          Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v the United Kingdom, another landmark Strasbourg case in which the Grand Chamber refused the UK’s referral of the case to its jurisdiction following PIL’s success in March 2010 in establishing that awaiting the death penalty constituted torture.  Mr Al-Saadoon and Mr Mufdhi, who faced the death penalty by hanging as a result of their transfer to the Iraqi authorities by British Forces, are now free men.
 
      In addition, the Court of Appeal will shortly decide on whether the Secretary of State for Defence must now order a public inquiry into the ill-treatment of hundreds of Iraqis detained by British Forces between 2003 and 2008.  A separate inquiry is already being conducted into allegations of unlawful killings by British soldiers at Camp Abu Naji in May 2004.  Meanwhile the High Court last week heard PIL’s judicial review challenge to library closures in Somerset and Gloucestershire, and PIL is also preparing to challenge the tuition fees regimes in Scotland and Northern Ireland as they apply to students from elsewhere in the UK.

 

The others shortlisted for the award are David Allen Green, Jo Cooper, Dean Parnell, Daniel Winterfeldt and Julian Young.  The awards ceremony will be held in London on 18 October 2011.


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  HIGH COURT RULES IN HUNDREDS OF IRAQI UNLAWFUL KILLINGS AND TORTURE CASES...
  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...
  BBC: New Iraq abuse cases by British forces go to High Court...
  Public Interest Lawyers respond to false reports in the Sun Newspaper regarding cases relating to Af...
  Legal Challenge to Doncaster Mayor's Decision to Reduce Library Funding wins Permission to Appeal...
  Observer: Is Britain guilty of systemic torture in Iraq?...
  Ali Zaki Mousa (no.2) and Others v Secretary of State for Defence...
  Legal Challenge to Cuts to North Somerset Youth Services Wins Permission to Appeal...
  New Statesman: The trials of Roseline Akhalu...