Public Interest Lawyers is an extraordinary firm of solicitors, who must be – certainly should be – the pride of the legal profession. Through their tenacity, quality and sheer hard work – often from unpromising beginnings and in dark times for public funding – they have single-handedly been responsible for shining the torchlight of legal accountability in a range of new areas. The work continues unabated. No barrister or judge, here or in Strasbourg, could have come to deal with the sorts of human rights issues which PIL continues to raise, but for their principled and brave pursuit of justice.

 

PIL demonstrates three further important things. First, how positive and constructive can be the use of public funding in public law cases, in the public interest. It has been hard. But PIL and the LSC have forged a partnership which is second to none, as to the importance of the cases that are brought, their success and their wider impact. Secondly, PIL demonstrates that London does not always lead, and a London-centric focus is neither helpful nor fair. This firm, from what are still sometimes thought of as “the provinces”, is the nation’s leader for human rights application in challenging cases. That PIL is looking, as a Birmingham-based firm. How refreshing for it to be that way.Thirdly, let it not be forgotten that PIL was set up as a new firm of solicitors. This is not the further and continued work of an established firm, set up long ago when times were different. This was an innovation; a leap of faith in the rule of law. It was a boat launched in a sea of uncertainty, which has turned out to be the flagship for public law accountability under the rule of law.

 

Michael Fordham QC
Michael Fordham QC
 
 

The Independent: Pressure Builds for Inquiries into Iraq Abuses

Nina Lakhani
 

The government is under pressure to sanction public inquiries into the alleged unlawful killings, torture and abuse of hundreds of Iraqis by British armed forces amid a series of landmark legal challenges that could force its hand.

 

The Ministry of Defence is facing legal action by the families of 32 dead Iraqi civilians, who they say were killed unlawfully by British troops, unless it agrees to hold an independent inquiry into the deaths so that lessons can be learnt. Among the dead are Hanaan Salih Matrood, an eight-year-old girl, who died after being shot by a British patrol in August 2003. The MoD denies the deaths were unlawful.

 

Lawyers acting for the 32 families say that a public inquiry is unavoidable following a landmark judgment by Europe's highest court earlier this year. Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) is calling on the MoD to concede rather than force the case to go to the Supreme Court. In July, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the British Government was responsible for securing the human rights of all individuals under its power and control in Iraq. Any credible allegations of ill-treatment or unlawful killing by British forces must therefore be investigated publicly and independently. This contradicts an earlier ruling by the law lords who found that the death of the hotel worker Baha Mousa was an "exceptional case", because he died on a British base in Basra.

 

But damning findings from the two-year Baha Mousa public inquiry, published on Thursday, have added further pressure on the Government after a large number of soldiers, officers, regiments and the MoD were implicated in the routine use of illegal interrogation techniques in Iraq. The inquiry found "serious and gratuitous" violence inflicted by 1st Battalion, The Queen's Lancashire Regiment against Mousa and nine other innocent civilians was not an isolated incident.

 

Phil Shiner of PIL said: "The MoD has acted disgracefully for years in its attempts to secure impunity for the human rights violations of Iraqi civilians by its personnel. It has deployed every dirty trick in the book to keep these dreadful cases and torturous practices hidden from public view. If common sense prevailed, coupled with a proper concern not to waste any more taxpayers' money, it would now set up the two further inquiries that are needed."

 

The Court of Appeal will rule next month whether a public inquiry must be held into the case involving 142 Iraqis which is led by Ali Zaki Mousa, who was allegedly beaten and tortured by British forces. The MoD insists investigations by the Royal Military Police in the Iraq Historic Allegations Team will suffice.

 

Case Study

 

Army shot girl, eight, so why no investigation?

 

*Hanaan Salih Matrood, eight, was shot and killed by a soldier from B Company of 1st Battalion, The King's Regiment on 21 August 2003. The Battalion claims Hanaan was hit by a warning shot fired to break up a hostile group of stone-throwers during a patrol in Basra.

 

Iraqi witnesses and Hanaan's family say she was among a group of children who gathered about 60 metres from the armoured vehicle near her home. They deny anyone was throwing stones, and claim a soldier suddenly fired a shot which hit Hanaan in the stomach.

 

The child's uncle carried her to the vehicle and claims the soldiers did not want to take her to hospital, but later did, where she died. The family were then given inaccurate information about their rights with regards to submitting a claim for compensation.

 

No investigation was carried out by the UK military authorities, according to information provided by the minister for Armed Forces in January 2004.
 
See: 
 


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...
  BBC: New Iraq abuse cases by British forces go to High Court...
  Public Interest Lawyers respond to false reports in the Sun Newspaper regarding cases relating to Af...
  Legal Challenge to Doncaster Mayor's Decision to Reduce Library Funding wins Permission to Appeal...
  Observer: Is Britain guilty of systemic torture in Iraq?...
  Ali Zaki Mousa (no.2) and Others v Secretary of State for Defence...
  Legal Challenge to Cuts to North Somerset Youth Services Wins Permission to Appeal...
  New Statesman: The trials of Roseline Akhalu...
  Maya Evans case: secret courts, torture and avoiding embarrassment...