"We cannot part with this case without paying tribute to the claimants\' legal advisers who although greatly outnumbered by the Secretary of State\'s legal team have persisted with their requests for disclosure skilfully and with commendable determination." (per Lord Justice Scott-Baker in  R (on the application of Al-Sweady and Others) v The Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin)).
Lord Justice Scott-Baker
 
 

Public Interest Lawyers Condemn Alleged Removal of Afghan’s Body Parts as ‘Souvenirs’

Public Interest Lawyers condemns the alleged mutilation of a deceased Taliban fighter currently being investigated by the Royal Military Police. The Daily Mail and others have reported that a soldier from the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders cut off the fingers from dead Taliban fighters during his first tour of duty in Helmand province between September 2010 and April this year. It is alleged that the soldier took the fingers as “souvenirs”.1

 

The prohibition against mutilating dead bodies was first codified as a crime of international law in the 1907 Hague Convention, and has formed an important part of customary international law for much longer. It is now contained within the Geneva Conventions, and is a war crime under the Statute of the International Criminal Court. Mutilating the dead is also clearly prohibited by the UK’s own Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict.2

 

As news sources have noted, these allegations come a month after Public Interest Lawyers’ victory in the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Al-Skeini, which held that human rights jurisdiction extends to all foreign territory controlled by British forces, in that case South East Iraq during 2003-2004. This resulted in the ordering of an independent investigation into the deaths of a number of Iraqi civilians in Basra. The European Convention also operates to prohibit the mutilation of deceased persons.

 

Soldiers from the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders are already the focus of the Al-Sweady Public Inquiry’s investigations into allegations that British soldiers abused and killed up to 20 Iraqi detainees in May 2004. This includes allegations that the dead bodies received from the British base, Camp Abu Naji, on 15 May 2004 had been mutilated, which were made immediately and voiceferously by relatives at the time. Public Interest Lawyers act for the Iraqi Complainants before that Inquiry.

Speaking today, Daniel Carey, a solicitor at Public Interest Lawyers, said:

 

“Unfortunately, these are not the first allegations of mutilation of dead bodies that British soldiers have faced. The Al-Sweady Public Inquiry is looking at similar allegations in Iraq which were made in May 2004 and which were not adequately investigated by the military police at the time. Clearly questions need to be answered about the extent of this practice.”

 

1 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2023701/British-soldier-cut-Taliban-fighters-fingers-macabre-souvenir-hunt.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

2  See e.g. http://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule113

 

In the case of Evans, Public Interest Lawyers successfully challenged the UK’s policy of handing-over Afghan prisoners to the Afghan Secret Police (the “NDS”) in 2009, resulting in greater safeguards against torture being put in place.


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  HIGH COURT RULES IN HUNDREDS OF IRAQI UNLAWFUL KILLINGS AND TORTURE CASES...
  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...
  BBC: New Iraq abuse cases by British forces go to High Court...
  Public Interest Lawyers respond to false reports in the Sun Newspaper regarding cases relating to Af...
  Legal Challenge to Doncaster Mayor's Decision to Reduce Library Funding wins Permission to Appeal...
  Observer: Is Britain guilty of systemic torture in Iraq?...
  Ali Zaki Mousa (no.2) and Others v Secretary of State for Defence...
  Legal Challenge to Cuts to North Somerset Youth Services Wins Permission to Appeal...
  New Statesman: The trials of Roseline Akhalu...