Administrative and Public Law

"This niche Birmingham firm is well regarded for its work representing individuals in human rights claims. It enjoys a strong reputation for its representation of claimants affected by the \war on terror, having acted for Iraqi civilians and the families of British soldiers killed in Iraq. The firm has expertise in international human rights law and acts for Daoud Mousa and nine others in the Baha Mousa public inquiry."

KEY INDIVIDUALS Philip Shiner leads the team and is considered to be "committed, driven, determined and admirable."

Band 1 (Philip Shiner)

Band 2 (Firm)


Civil Liberties

"This public law firm is renowned for its cutting-edge work defending the human rights of individuals connected to the Iraq war. It recently won success in the landmark ECHR case which condemned the UK government for breaching international human rights law for subjecting two Iraqis to the fear of execution in Iraq."

"KEY INDIVIDUALS Philip Shiner is an outstanding civil liberties solicitor who handles "terrific, ground-breaking cases" and "never gives up fighting for his clients." Dan Carey has emerged as a force in his own right. He is praised for his involvement in significant human rights cases including Al-Sweady, Evans, Al-Haq and the Baha Mousa Inquiry."

Star Rating (Philip Shiner)

Associate to Watch (Dan Carey)

Band 2 (Firm)

Chambers and Partners
 
 

Gurkhas' Bid to End Ongoing Discrimination

In a bid to end the ongoing discrimination suffered by the Gurkha community, Public Interest Lawyers have sent a letter before action to the Secretary of State for Defence, Dr Liam Fox. Sent on behalf of a number of clients represented by the Gurkha Army Ex-Serviceman’s Organisation (GAESO UK) the letter before action seeks a long overdue review of the pension and severance entitlements provided to Gurkha soldiers on retirement. A response from the Government is required by 8 November 2010.

 

Members of the Coalition Government have in the past been publicly very supportive of the Gurkha cause and we hope that Ministers will stand by their previous words of support and ensure that the ongoing discrimination suffered by the Gurkhas is finally brought to an end. It should be a matter of national shame that the Gurkhas have had to resort to a long running history of litigation and media campaigns in order to try and secure equal treatment.

 

The High Court and Court of Appeal recently considered a case brought by British Gurkha Welfare Society (BGWS) relating to pension entitlement in which it was found that the differential entitlement was justified. However, the case was issued prior to the change in the 2009 immigration rules which were for the purposes of the litigation “agreed by all parties to be irrelevant”. Our letter before action demands a formal review of pension entitlement in light of those important immigration rule changes. The changes fundamentally alter the assumption of where Gurkhas and their families are likely to retire and therefore alter the premise on which differential pension entitlement was previously justified.

 

All Gurkhas now have the right to live and settle in the UK. Our clients, after loyally serving this Country, have chosen to live here and yet they are left to live in abject poverty, relying on state benefits because the pensions that they receive are wholly inadequate. This unlawful discrimination must end.

 

Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers comments:

 

 

It cannot be right that a Gurkha soldier, who like his British counterpart has risked life and limb to serve the Crown, is left to live in Britain in poverty simply because he is of a different nationality. The Government must act now to end this ongoing discrimination. Gurkha soldiers and their families deserve equal treatment. That is all they ask for, nothing more, nothing less.” 

 

 

 

For more information, please contact Tessa Gregory on tessa.gregory@publicinterestlawyers.co.uk or 0121 515 5069


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...
  BBC: New Iraq abuse cases by British forces go to High Court...
  Public Interest Lawyers respond to false reports in the Sun Newspaper regarding cases relating to Af...
  Legal Challenge to Doncaster Mayor's Decision to Reduce Library Funding wins Permission to Appeal...
  Observer: Is Britain guilty of systemic torture in Iraq?...
  Ali Zaki Mousa (no.2) and Others v Secretary of State for Defence...
  Legal Challenge to Cuts to North Somerset Youth Services Wins Permission to Appeal...
  New Statesman: The trials of Roseline Akhalu...
  Maya Evans case: secret courts, torture and avoiding embarrassment...