Public Interest Lawyers is an extraordinary firm of solicitors, who must be – certainly should be – the pride of the legal profession. Through their tenacity, quality and sheer hard work – often from unpromising beginnings and in dark times for public funding – they have single-handedly been responsible for shining the torchlight of legal accountability in a range of new areas. The work continues unabated. No barrister or judge, here or in Strasbourg, could have come to deal with the sorts of human rights issues which PIL continues to raise, but for their principled and brave pursuit of justice.

 

PIL demonstrates three further important things. First, how positive and constructive can be the use of public funding in public law cases, in the public interest. It has been hard. But PIL and the LSC have forged a partnership which is second to none, as to the importance of the cases that are brought, their success and their wider impact. Secondly, PIL demonstrates that London does not always lead, and a London-centric focus is neither helpful nor fair. This firm, from what are still sometimes thought of as “the provinces”, is the nation’s leader for human rights application in challenging cases. That PIL is looking, as a Birmingham-based firm. How refreshing for it to be that way.Thirdly, let it not be forgotten that PIL was set up as a new firm of solicitors. This is not the further and continued work of an established firm, set up long ago when times were different. This was an innovation; a leap of faith in the rule of law. It was a boat launched in a sea of uncertainty, which has turned out to be the flagship for public law accountability under the rule of law.

 

Michael Fordham QC
Michael Fordham QC
 
 

Channel 4 News: Libraries Latest Battleground in Legal Fight Against Cuts

A leading public interest lawyer tells Channel 4 News the Government should expect more legal challenges against spending cuts.

 

Anti-cuts campaigners will increasingly use the law to challenge Government spending decisions, a leading human rights lawyer has told Channel 4 News.

 

Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers has brought an action against Gloucestershire County Council in a bid to stop the local authority closing ten of the county's 38 libraries.

 

Campaigners won a High Court injunction last month, although the council says it is confident of victory when it returns to court to try to overturn the injunction on 7 July.

 

Mr Shiner told Channel 4 News the Coalition should expect similar lawsuits in the future as campaign groups use lawyers to challenge public spending cuts.

 

He said: "I think the law is a legitimate part of an overally strategy that people are using now to try to stop these cutbacks.”

 

"Another big case we have got coming up in the autumn is a full two-day hearing challenging the decision on December 9 to allow universities to raise tuition fees to up to £9,000."

 

He added: "There are a huge number of areas out there. I am aware of a number of other lawyers in this field who are lining up potential challenges to Government cutbacks, and how they affect a range of disadvantaged groups."

 

The news comes as Disability Alliance announced it is seeking to take the Government to court for failing to ensure disabled people do not suffer hardship as a result of cuts to benefits.

 

Councillor Sue Coakley from Lechlade Town Council said: "We understand that they need to cut costs, but the solution they are trying to impose is that we lose our county library.

"The library is at the heart of our community.
 
 
See the following link to view the news report: 
 


Other stories

Click on a story to read

  BBC: Baha Mousa book and Marie Colvin honoured by Orwell Prize ...
  HIGH COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AFGHAN KILLINGS CASE...
  Guardian: British soldier under investigation for murder over shooting of young Afghans...
  Guardian: Labour abstention on workfare bill prompts party infighting...
  The Independent: First Al-Sweady witnesses to appear...
  DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments after Poundland ruling...
  Judicial Review launched against Birmingham City Council over cuts to "Shelforce" - a supported disa...
  The Times: Lawyer of the week – Tessa Gregory...
  BBC: Al-Sweady inquiry opens in UK into deaths of Iraqis...
  Birmingham City Council threatened with Judicial Review proceedings over cuts to 'Shelforce' - a sup...
  Open Democracy: Home Secretary, please call off the attack on kidney patient Roseline Akhalu ...
  Court of Appeal Rules that the Government’s “Back to Work” Regulations are Unlawful and Must Be Quas...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down tomorrow, Tuesday 12 February 201...
  Verdict on Government’s “Back to Work” schemes will be handed down on Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 10...
  BBC: New Iraq abuse cases by British forces go to High Court...
  Public Interest Lawyers respond to false reports in the Sun Newspaper regarding cases relating to Af...
  Legal Challenge to Doncaster Mayor's Decision to Reduce Library Funding wins Permission to Appeal...
  Observer: Is Britain guilty of systemic torture in Iraq?...
  Ali Zaki Mousa (no.2) and Others v Secretary of State for Defence...
  Legal Challenge to Cuts to North Somerset Youth Services Wins Permission to Appeal...
  New Statesman: The trials of Roseline Akhalu...
  Maya Evans case: secret courts, torture and avoiding embarrassment...